Free Essays on Inclusion

INCLUSION (PROS AND CONS) As I get further in my education to become a teacher, I find that there are many issues that I will have to answer to accommodate my students and myself. One particular issue being full inclusion. Full inclusion is an ongoing issue within education. Question like should all students, even students with disabilities be included in a regular education class. Teacher’s must ask themselves the pros and cons of full inclusion in the classroom. As a future teacher examined the pros and cons of full inclusion and my position on full inclusion of all disabled children. Some of the positive things about full inclusion of all students include that children with special needs get to socialize with normal developing children, and hence is learning skills needed for life. The other students (non-disabled) learn about disabilities and how to get past their fears about disabilities and find out about the person inside. If inclusion is done at an early age, â€Å"normal† students develop empathy at an early age. Students with disabilities develop confidence when included in a regular classroom, they also develop contacts, and friendships through different ages. The students with special needs are included with their peers in their age group as part of a group, if they are separated from the peer group they become one of the kids in THAT class. Teachers can learn new strategies when working with special needs students and they also experience the joy of working with special needs children. There are also negative outcomes of full inclusion of all special needs students such as other kids in the class are unsure how to engage the child with special needs, and tend to just leave them alone. There is not enough time to do all the regular class work with the non-disabled children and give enough attention to the child with special needs. It also very hard to coordinate with all the specialist and services that special ne... Free Essays on Inclusion Free Essays on Inclusion Full Inclusion: Are the Schools Ready? In 1955, the story of a brave and tired woman named, Rosa Parks was put in front of this country's awareness (What is Inclusion). This woman had gotten historically "tired" of being denied equality. She wanted to be included in society in a full way, something which was denied to people labeled as "black". Therefore, Rosa Parks sat down on a bus in a section reserved for "white" people. When Rosa was told to go to "her place" at the back of the bus, she refused to move, was arrested, and history was challenged and changed. All of this happened because Rosa Parks was tired, historically tired, of being excluded. She had sat down and thereby stood up for inclusion. Another cry for inclusion is being heard today. This cry is being raised by people with disabilities. In the past, it was quite common for children with disabilities to be institutionalized or home schooled (Kavale, 279). Then, in the early twentieth century, many compulsory attendance laws were passed that enabled some of the children with disabilities to attend public schools. However, in 1919, the Supreme Court declared, in Beattie v. Board of Education, that a school could exclude a child who had a condition that caused him to drool, have face contortions, and slurred speech. This ruling enabled schools to exclude some handicapped children. Later, in 1975, congress passed the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, which was the beginning of free and appropriate public education to all school age children, regardless of disability (Kavale, 282). This act led to special education programs in public schools. These special education programs essentially segregated disabled students from the general classrooms in public schools, but did provide more individualized attentio n along with different educational standards. This law was amended in 1990 and was renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and th... Free Essays on Inclusion INCLUSION (PROS AND CONS) As I get further in my education to become a teacher, I find that there are many issues that I will have to answer to accommodate my students and myself. One particular issue being full inclusion. Full inclusion is an ongoing issue within education. Question like should all students, even students with disabilities be included in a regular education class. Teacher’s must ask themselves the pros and cons of full inclusion in the classroom. As a future teacher examined the pros and cons of full inclusion and my position on full inclusion of all disabled children. Some of the positive things about full inclusion of all students include that children with special needs get to socialize with normal developing children, and hence is learning skills needed for life. The other students (non-disabled) learn about disabilities and how to get past their fears about disabilities and find out about the person inside. If inclusion is done at an early age, â€Å"normal† students develop empathy at an early age. Students with disabilities develop confidence when included in a regular classroom, they also develop contacts, and friendships through different ages. The students with special needs are included with their peers in their age group as part of a group, if they are separated from the peer group they become one of the kids in THAT class. Teachers can learn new strategies when working with special needs students and they also experience the joy of working with special needs children. There are also negative outcomes of full inclusion of all special needs students such as other kids in the class are unsure how to engage the child with special needs, and tend to just leave them alone. There is not enough time to do all the regular class work with the non-disabled children and give enough attention to the child with special needs. It also very hard to coordinate with all the specialist and services that special ne... Free Essays on Inclusion Inclusion Inclusive education means that all students in a school, regardless of their strengths or weaknesses in any area, become part of the school community. They are included in the feeling of belonging among other students, teachers, and support staff. The federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and its 1997 amendments make it clear that schools have a duty to educate children with disabilities in general education classrooms. The law adopted nearly a quarter-century ago guaranteed a free, appropriate education for all students with disabilities. From then on, schools began to experiment with "mainstreaming" by placing disabled students in the same classrooms and facilities as their nondisabled peers. Later, mainstreaming evolved into "inclusion," which holds that students not only should be placed in regular classrooms whenever possible but also that they should be engaged there, as well, in the same curriculum and activities as their classmates. The most current language of the federal mandate concerning inclusive education comes from the 1997 Amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). These federal regulations include rulings that guide the regulation. The IDEA requires that children with disabilities be educated in regular education classrooms unless "the nature and severity of the disability is such that education in the regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily." This means that schools have a duty to try to include students with disabilities in the regular general education classes. Several recent studies have found that inclusion is more effective than either integration or mainstreaming. A seven month investigation in which a classroom of first graders viewed and interacted with a student with moderate disabilities who was mainstreamed only on a part-time basis revealed that the part-time student was considered an ...