Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Economic Contribution of Melbourne Foodbowl for Vegetables

Question: Discuss about theEconomic Contribution of Melbourne Foodbowl for Vegetables. Answer: Melbourne is the second largest city in Australia, only second the Sydney. The city has a population of over 4.6 million people. Melbourne is also the most productive agricultural zone in Victoria; producing several varieties of foods, especially fresh vegetables. This essay discusses the contribution of Melbournes food bowl to the Australian economy (Deloitte Access Economics, 2016). Value of Melbournes Foodbowl Melbournes food-bowl constitutes over 1.7 million hectares of agricultural land. Several agricultural activities make up a number of commercial enterprises namely, fresh vegetable produce, dairy, poultry, and livestock other products. The total contribution of Melbourne to the regional economy amounts to $2.45 billion. The $2.45 billion contribution to the regional gross product represents 0.84% of the local economy. Similarly, the food-bowl contributes 7,687 direct and 5,719 indirect full-time employees and another 7,595 in the manufacturing industry. These employees make up 21,001 workers representing 1.06% of the total regional workforce. The amount has RGP contribution been growing over the years as the demand for food also grows. Melbourne is focused on resolving the paradox of urbanization brought about by increased demand for food while the production lowers. The potential impact of urbanization is evident in the amount of pressure being put on the farmland. The current scenario indicates that the food-bowl has been affected by urban encroachment and has been significantly reduced by 10,897 hectares, equivalent to 0.62% of the total food-bowl (Deloitte Access Economics, 2016). The amount of food sourced locally lacks adequate research for backing. Additionally, the information about the supply chain is not readily available to the public. Comparing local production and local consumption demonstrates that certain foods are locally sourced, but it is important to assess other factors that could affect the ratio (Carey Sheridan, 2017). Other factors for consideration include the perishability of fresh produce, seasonality of foods, traceability of produce, and the definition of local area. In the study, the definition of local is food produced in Melbournes food-bowl. The urban development in Melbourne is continuously affecting the value of the food-bowl in multiple ways. Some of how the urban encroachment is changing the food-bowl in that the agricultural land is becoming less, leading to lower food supply over time. Concomitantly, the population growth of Melbourne is growing leading to higher food demands. Both events drive the prices of food to higher levels. The threats to Melbournes food-bowl contribution due to urbanization are relevant. It is estimated that the city will have over 7 million people in the near future and this is expected to affect the current food-bowl capacity as the farmland gets lost to urban development. Future projections indicate that the annual agricultural output will reduce by between $32 million and $111 million, while food prices are expected to increase (Infrastructure Victoria, 2015). Conclusion and Recommendation Melbournes food-bowl produces significant benefits to the regional economy of Victoria. Other than providing food for the masses, the food-bowl creates employment to thousands of people who depend on agriculture for their livelihoods. However, the growing urbanization is threatening to reduce the supply capacity of the food-bowl while increasing the demand for food. Consequently, it is expected that the cost of food will modestly increase which will increase the total contribution to the regional gross product. City planners and developers can choose how they want the city to grow and where (Carey, Caraher, Lawrence, Friel, 2016). It is vital that Melbourne makes the right choices about available information on land use for the different purposes including food production and housing. References Carey, R., Sheridan, J. (2017). Australia's city food bowl's: fertile ground for investigating biomes and food security. Geographical Education, 30, 16-23. Carey, R., Caraher, M., Lawrence, M., Friel, S. (2016). Opportunities and challenges in developing a whole-of-government national food and nutrition policy: lessons from Australias National Food Plan. Public health nutrition, 19(1), 3-14. Deloitte Access Economics. (2016). The economic contribution of Melbourne's foodbowl. Melbourne: University of Melbourne. Infrastructure Victoria. (2015). The current and future state of Victoria: a spatial perspective. Melbourne: SGS Economics and Planning.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.